NonprofitGrantsProposalsFundraisingFlipbook

Grant Proposal Designer

A grant proposal has to do two things at once: meet a funder's published requirements exactly, and convince a review panel that the work is worth funding. Flipbooks AI takes the application your team has written and publishes it as a document people can actually read, on a link a trustee opens on a tablet and a program officer skims before a call. Submit to the portal in whatever format the funder demands. This is for every other copy. It is free, with no ads, no watermarks and no ceiling on the number of proposals you publish.

Grant Proposal Designer

How to Design a Grant Proposal Online

1

Upload the Application

Export the proposal from Word, Google Docs, InDesign or Canva as a PDF and upload it. Flipbooks AI builds the reader straight away, with your sections, tables and appendices in the order you wrote them.

2

Add Contents and Evidence

Add your logo and colors, build a clickable contents list into the budget and the evaluation plan, link citations out to their sources, and attach the letters of support so nothing arrives separately.

3

Share With the Board

Publish and send one link with the board papers, to a partner writing a letter of support, or to a program officer after a call. Keep it password protected while it is still in draft.

How to Create a Grant Proposal Flipbook

How to Create a Grant Proposal Flipbook

Start with the proposal document your team has already written, in Word, Google Docs, InDesign or Canva, and export it as a PDF. Upload it and Flipbooks AI builds a reader immediately, with the pages in the order you wrote them. Add your logo and colors so the document looks like it came from you. Build a clickable contents list so a reviewer reaches the budget in one tap. Link your citations out to the sources behind them, attach the appendices, and add a short video from a program site if it earns its place. Decide whether the document is private while it is in draft. Preview it on a tablet, publish, and send the link with your board papers.

What Is a Grant Proposal?

A grant proposal is a formal request for funding, written to a specification the funder has published. It normally carries a statement of need supported by evidence, a description of the program you intend to run, the outcomes you will be held to and how you will measure them, a budget with a narrative explaining every line, and a section on your organization's capacity to deliver. It is scored, often by a panel using a rubric, against criteria you were given in advance. That is what makes it a different document from a commercial bid: nobody is negotiating with you, and points are lost for answering a question the funder did not ask.

What Is a Grant Proposal?
What Is a Grant Proposal?
What Is a Grant Proposal?
What Is a Grant Proposal?

Follow the Funder Guidelines First

Nothing in this tool overrides the funder's instructions, and it is worth saying twice. If the call specifies a portal, a form, a word count, a font size, named file attachments or a particular order of sections, follow it exactly, because proposals are routinely screened out on compliance before anybody reads a word of the argument. Build the version you submit to their rules first. Then publish the same content here for the readers who are not the funder.

Follow the Funder Guidelines First

Trusted by Fortune 500 Companies

Writing the Statement of Need

Writing the Statement of Need

The statement of need is where most proposals are won or lost, and the common failure is describing your organization's need for money rather than a community's need for the work. Lead with evidence a reader can verify: local data, service records, waiting lists, published research, the gap between demand and provision. Then bring one specific person or situation into it, because panels are made of people and a number alone rarely moves anyone. In a flipbook you can link every figure to its source, so a reviewer who wants to check a claim can do it in one tap.

Where a Flipbook Fits in the Grant Cycle
Where a Flipbook Fits in the Grant Cycle
Where a Flipbook Fits in the Grant Cycle
Where a Flipbook Fits in the Grant Cycle

Where a Flipbook Fits in the Grant Cycle

Be clear about this, because it saves disappointment later. Most funders require submission through their own portal, in their own format, often with page limits, font sizes and named attachments. A flipbook does not replace that submission and should not be sent instead of it. What it replaces is every other copy of the proposal: the version your board reviews before sign off, the one a partner organization needs in order to write a letter of support, the summary a program officer asks for after an initial call, the copy your fundraising committee wants on their phones.

Presenting a Budget People Can Follow

A budget gets read more carefully than any other part of a proposal, usually by somebody who reviews budgets all day. Keep the table simple and let the narrative do the explaining: what each line buys, how the figure was reached, which costs are direct and which are shared, what other funding is confirmed and what is pending. State your full cost of delivery honestly rather than hiding overheads inside program lines, because experienced funders can see it and it damages trust. In a flipbook a wide budget table can be zoomed without being reformatted.

Presenting a Budget People Can Follow

Grant Proposal Design Alternatives

Canva

Canva

  • Free and Unlimited
  • No Watermarks
  • Clickable Contents
  • Reader Analytics
  • Tablet Ready
  • Instant Updates
  • Fast Loading
  • Password Protection
  • Embed on Your Site
  • Video and Audio
Flipbooks AI

Flipbooks AI

  • Free and Unlimited
  • No Watermarks
  • Clickable Contents
  • Reader Analytics
  • Tablet Ready
  • Instant Updates
  • Fast Loading
  • Password Protection
  • Embed on Your Site
  • Video and Audio
FlipHTML5

FlipHTML5

  • Free and Unlimited
  • No Watermarks
  • Clickable Contents
  • Reader Analytics
  • Tablet Ready
  • Instant Updates
  • Fast Loading
  • Password Protection
  • Embed on Your Site
  • Video and Audio
Issuu

Issuu

  • Free and Unlimited
  • No Watermarks
  • Clickable Contents
  • Reader Analytics
  • Tablet Ready
  • Instant Updates
  • Fast Loading
  • Password Protection
  • Embed on Your Site
  • Video and Audio
Logic Models, Outcomes and Evaluation

Logic Models, Outcomes and Evaluation

Funders increasingly ask you to show the chain from activity to outcome: what you will do, what changes as a result, how you will know, and what you will do if it does not work. Keep outcomes to a number you can genuinely measure with the staff you have, and say who collects the data and when. A logic model or theory of change diagram is much easier to read at full size than shrunk into a margin, and a flipbook lets a reviewer zoom into it. If you have evaluation reports from previous work, link to them rather than summarizing them,.

Features for an Evidence Led Proposal

A funding application is long, structured and full of things a reader needs to navigate rather than plough through. Flipbooks AI gives that structure somewhere to live. A clickable table of contents takes a reviewer straight to the budget or the evaluation plan. Search lets somebody find every mention of safeguarding without rereading forty pages. Charts and tables can be zoomed rather than squinted at. Citations and data sources can link out to the studies behind them, which is the quickest way to show that a needs statement rests on published evidence.

Features for an Evidence Led Proposal
Features for an Evidence Led Proposal
Features for an Evidence Led Proposal
Features for an Evidence Led Proposal

Letters of Support and Appendices

Appendices are where proposals become unwieldy: letters of support, governing documents, audited accounts, safeguarding policies. Sent as separate attachments they arrive out of order and go missing. Kept as one document with a clickable contents list, they stay where they belong and a reader can move between the main text and the annex without losing the thread. Follow the funder's rules about what may be attached to the submission itself, and use the shared version for everyone who simply needs the full picture in one place.

Letters of Support and Appendices
Organizational Capacity and Governance

Organizational Capacity and Governance

Panels want to know that you can deliver what you are proposing and that the money will be looked after. That section usually covers your track record on similar work, the staff and volunteers who will run the program, how the board oversees it, your financial controls and your policies. It reads better with specifics than with adjectives: years running the service, numbers supported last year, the qualifications of the person who will lead, the frequency of board meetings. Linking to your published accounts and your registration details lets a reviewer verify all of it without emailing you to ask.

Foundation, Government and Corporate Funders
Foundation, Government and Corporate Funders
Foundation, Government and Corporate Funders
Foundation, Government and Corporate Funders

Foundation, Government and Corporate Funders

The register changes with the funder and the document has to change with it. A family foundation may want six pages and a conversation. A government program will specify the structure line by line and score each section separately. A corporate giving team often wants a short case with a clear alignment to their priorities and something they can circulate internally. Flipbooks AI is indifferent to length and structure, so the same tool carries a four page community grant and a ninety page federal application with its appendices attached.

What This Saves a Development Team

Grant teams are small and the calendar is unforgiving: several deadlines a month, each with its own format, and a board that meets when it meets. Publishing the proposal as a link takes minutes and removes a familiar set of costs. No printing and posting board packs. No chasing which version a trustee is commenting on. No attachment bouncing off a mail server because the appendices pushed it over a size limit. No rebuilding a document because a partner needs it in a hurry.

What This Saves a Development Team

Who Writes Grant Proposals

2456+

Nonprofits

6

Development Teams

13

Grant Writers

24

Charities

65

Universities

9

Community Groups

Accessible to Every Reviewer

Accessible to Every Reviewer

Some of the people reading your proposal will be trustees in their seventies, some will use a screen reader, and some will be reading on a phone in poor light. Screen reader support means the text can be read aloud rather than sitting in an image nobody can reach. Keyboard navigation lets a reader move through the document without a mouse. Clear contrast and generous type keep a dense document legible.

How a Proposal Reads on a Tablet

Trustees read board papers on tablets, on trains and late in the evening, and a fifty page PDF is where good intentions go to die. A flipbook opens from a link with nothing to download, remembers where the reader stopped, and lets somebody move through sections with a tap rather than scrolling through an entire document to find the budget again. If your board has ever approved a proposal nobody finished reading, this is the part that changes it.

How a Proposal Reads on a Tablet
How a Proposal Reads on a Tablet
How a Proposal Reads on a Tablet
How a Proposal Reads on a Tablet

Opens Quickly for a Busy Reviewer

A large proposal with photographs, charts and scanned letters can become an unwieldy file, and a reviewer with fifteen minutes will not wait for it. Flipbooks AI compresses the images so charts and photographs stay sharp while the document stays light, shows the first pages quickly and loads the rest in the background. There is nothing to download and no software to open.

Opens Quickly for a Busy Reviewer
Works With Word, InDesign and Canva

Works With Word, InDesign and Canva

The writing stays where your team already writes. Export a PDF from Microsoft Word, Google Docs, Adobe InDesign, Canva or LibreOffice and upload it. Link out to the tools you already use: your published accounts, an evaluation report, a partner's website, a Google Form for expressions of interest, a donation page for the version you share publicly after an award. Embed the document on your own site or your intranet.

Free for Nonprofits, With No Watermark
Free for Nonprofits, With No Watermark
Free for Nonprofits, With No Watermark
Free for Nonprofits, With No Watermark

Free for Nonprofits, With No Watermark

Flipbooks AI is completely free, which matters in a sector where software budgets come out of the same pot as program delivery. There is no watermark across a document going to a funder, no cap on the number of proposals you publish, and no feature held back for a paid tier. A small charity that submits thirty applications a year can publish every one of them, keep the archive, and share each with its board without adding a line to the overheads a funder will scrutinize.

Keep a Library of Past Proposals

Almost every proposal borrows from an earlier one, and the difference between a fast turnaround and a lost weekend is knowing where the good version of the safeguarding section lives. Keep every application you have published: successful ones, unsuccessful ones, the renewal, the one written for a funder who changed their priorities. Store the interim and final reports beside them.

Keep a Library of Past Proposals

What Development Teams Say

We submit around thirty applications a year and the board sees most of them first. Sending one link instead of a forty page attachment ended the version confusion completely. Our chair reads on a tablet and told me it was the first time she had reached the evaluation section before the meeting rather than during it.

Marketing team
Marketing team

Product catalogs

I write proposals freelance for four small charities, and the archive is what I value. Every application I have published is one link away, so when a funder asks what a client proposed two years ago I answer that morning. Linking citations to their sources has also stopped reviewers emailing to ask where a figure came from.

Studio owner
Studio owner

Client lookbooks

Our research office prepares long applications with appendices that used to arrive as eight separate files. Now the whole package is one document with a contents list, and the partners writing letters of support can see exactly where their contribution sits. The submission still goes through the funder portal, which is as it should be.

School office
School office

Newsletters and programmes

We are a community group with no budget for software, so free without a watermark was the deciding factor. Putting a password on the draft while trustees reviewed it meant the figures stayed inside the organization until they were agreed. The reading statistics showed us that nobody was getting past the need section, so we cut it in half.

Independent designer
Independent designer

Portfolio flipbooks

Keep a Draft Proposal Private

Keep a Draft Proposal Private

A proposal in draft should not be findable. Put a password on it while trustees are reviewing, while a partner is confirming their contribution or while figures are still moving, and turn off downloading when you would rather a version with provisional numbers did not circulate as a file. Secure hosting keeps it where you put it.

Share It With Trustees, Partners and Officers

Circulating a proposal usually means a chain of attachments and a fair amount of guessing about which version somebody has. A single link removes that. Send it to the board with the papers, to a partner who is drafting a letter of support, to the finance lead who only needs the budget section, or to a program officer who asked for something short after a call. Password protection keeps a draft inside the organization until trustees have signed it off, and the same link keeps working after you replace the file.

Share It With Trustees, Partners and Officers
Share It With Trustees, Partners and Officers
Share It With Trustees, Partners and Officers
Share It With Trustees, Partners and Officers

Details That Make a Proposal Easier to Score

Reviewers work through a rubric, often at speed, and anything that helps them find a criterion earns you goodwill. Use the funder's own headings in the funder's own order. Answer the question asked before adding context. Put the summary at the front and keep it to a page. Label every table and figure. Number the sections and let the contents list link to them. Say plainly what the money will buy and what will exist at the end that does not exist now.

Details That Make a Proposal Easier to Score

Compare Grant Proposal Tools

ApplicationRatingUnlimited CreditsUsage RatingDescription
10/10Yes1

Flipbooks AI publishes the application your team has written as a document anybody can read at a link: unlimited proposals, no watermark, a clickable contents list into the budget and the evaluation plan, appendices kept in one place, password protection while it is in draft, and statistics on what your readers actually reach.

Microsoft Word

5.2/10No2

Word is where most grant proposals are genuinely written, and its tracked changes and comments are hard to beat when three people are arguing over a needs statement. It stops at the document. Sharing means attachments and version numbers, and a fifty page file with appendices is exactly the sort of thing that bounces off a mail server.

Google Docs

7.1/10No3

Google Docs is excellent for drafting with a team spread across offices, and the comment threads keep a review honest. What it produces is a working document. Layout control is limited for anything with charts and tables, and sharing settings on a document containing draft figures are easy to get wrong in a rush.

Adobe InDesign

8.3/10No4

InDesign gives a designed proposal the typographic control it deserves, which shows on a document with logic models, budget tables and photographs. It is a layout program requiring real skill, and it hands you a PDF at the end. Hosting that PDF, keeping it current and sharing it with a board are separate problems.

Canva

6.4/10No5

Canva has become a common choice for smaller charities without a designer, and it gets a proposal looking presentable quickly. Its strength is single pages and short documents rather than long structured ones, and what it gives you to share is a flat file or a basic preview rather than a document a reader can navigate.

Submittable

7.8/10No6

Submittable is a submission platform many funders use to receive and score applications, and if a call runs on it you will be filling in its forms whether you like them or not. It belongs to the funder rather than to you, so it is not somewhere to prepare a board copy or share a proposal with a partner.

FlipHTML5

6.9/10No7

FlipHTML5 converts PDFs into page turning documents and has a broad set of options built up over years. The free route marks the document with its own branding and holds the reporting back, which is an awkward thing to explain when the document is a funding application from a charity.

Issuu

8.1/10No8

Issuu hosts documents reliably and has a browsing audience of its own, which suits a published impact report. For a proposal that is going to a named funder and a board, that audience is beside the point, and the free reader places Issuu branding and other publications around your pages.

Publuu

6.5/10No9

Publuu produces clean flipbooks quickly and its tracking is straightforward to read, which appeals to a small team without technical support. The longer documents and the fuller statistics that a grant proposal actually needs sit on paid plans, and free versions stay deliberately limited.

PDF Email Attachment

7.6/10No10

Emailing the proposal to trustees is what most organizations do, and it costs nothing. It also means several versions in circulation, appendices that arrive in the wrong order or not at all, files too large for some inboxes, and no way of knowing whether the board read past the summary.

Renewals, Reports and Second Rounds

Renewals, Reports and Second Rounds

The proposal is the beginning of the relationship, not the end. Interim and final reports are read by the same team, and a funder who can see the reporting in the same clear format as the application is being reminded that you deliver as carefully as you write. If you were unsuccessful, keep the feedback with the proposal it refers to, because the second round of a program is often where a well argued application finally lands.

See Which Sections Get Read
See Which Sections Get Read
See Which Sections Get Read
See Which Sections Get Read

See Which Sections Get Read

A submitted PDF disappears into a portal and tells you nothing. The copies you share as links do not. You can see how many people opened the proposal, which sections held attention and where readers stopped. If trustees consistently stop at the budget narrative, the budget narrative needs rewriting. It is not a measure of your chances, and it says nothing about the panel, but it is real information about how your writing performs.

A Proposal Format That Ages Well

Funding relationships run for years, and the documents that support them need to still open when somebody goes looking. A link that works on whatever device a trustee buys next, with no software to install and no file format to migrate, is a small piece of institutional memory that looks after itself. Flipbooks AI keeps pace with browsers and devices, updates arrive without any work from your team.

A Proposal Format That Ages Well

Frequently Asked
Grant Proposal Designer

What is a grant proposal flipbook?

It is your funding application published as a readable digital document at a link. Trustees, partners and program officers open it on any device with nothing to download, use a clickable contents list to reach the budget or the evaluation plan, and zoom into tables without reformatting anything.

Can I submit a flipbook to a funder?

Usually not, and you should not try. Most funders require a submission through their own portal in a specified format, and applications are screened out on compliance. Submit exactly what they ask for, then use the flipbook for your board, your partners and anyone else who needs to read the proposal.

Is the grant proposal designer free to use?

Yes. It is completely free, with no watermark on a document going to a funder, no limit on how many proposals you publish and no feature reserved for a paid tier. Branding, clickable contents, password protection and the reading statistics are all included.

How is this different from a business proposal?

A commercial proposal is negotiated with a buyer who can change the brief. A grant proposal is scored against criteria published in advance by a panel you will probably never meet, so it has to answer their questions in their order rather than make your own case in your own way.

Can I include a budget table and appendices?

Yes. There is no page limit here, so the budget, the budget narrative, letters of support, policies and audited accounts can all live in one document with a contents list linking to each. Wide tables can be zoomed rather than shrunk to fit a margin.

Can I keep a draft proposal private?

Yes. Put a password on it while trustees are reviewing or while figures are still moving, and turn off downloading so a draft with provisional numbers does not circulate as a file. You can open the same link to a wider audience once the application has gone in.

Will the proposal open properly on a tablet?

Yes. It runs in the browser on tablets, phones and desktops with no app to install, which is how most trustees read board papers. Sections are reached with a tap instead of scrolling through the whole document, and charts stay legible on a small screen.

Can I see which sections people read?

For the copies you share as a link, yes. You can see how many people opened the proposal, which sections held their attention and where they stopped reading. That tells you nothing about the funder's panel, but a great deal about how your writing is landing.

Have more questions?

If you still have questions or want to explore more details about our features, limitations, and usage, we invite you to visit our full FAQ page.